I was thinking about your references to "Lyme Disease" and "Ebola Virus"...you correctly noted that each of them identifies the location where the diseases were judged to have first occurred. In the case of "Lyme Disease", it was Lyme, Connecticut (fun fact: I have lived in CT and was quite aware of the disease)...and in the case of the "Ebola Virus", it was indeed along the Ebola River in what is now the Democratic Republic of Congo. With those two examples in mind, I would have thought that you'd refer to the 'epicenter' of COVID-19 as the "Wuhan Virus", but instead you used the much less precise description of "China Virus"...
Now let's reflect back on what caught my eye earlier...you posted the following statement "They started the virus", and then followed it up with "Prob working on vaccine from day one". You could have just said that the virus started in Wuhan, but chose not to make that simple statement...instead using the head scratching terms just mentioned.
Imagine if someone used the terms "American Disease", or "Congo Virus" instead of "Lyme" or "Ebola", and added "They started the disease/virus...prob working on the vaccine from day one"...
would that seem odd - or maybe even objectionable to you?
All that being said, the body and intent of my original post was to cite the importance of international cooperation in addressing deadly pathogen outbreaks (as was done with smallpox) that the scientific community deems to have been produced by animal to human transmission. In the case of China, we need to put U.S. personnel back in that country, along with establishing procedures and protocols that will better prepare us for highly likely future outbreaks in that region. Hopefully, we'll get around to that substance after you've sated yourself on naming conventions.