"President Barack Obama had a number of potential nominees who were rated as “not qualified” — who he then didn’t actually nominate.
Trump’s decision to skip the ABA vetting process means that he’s then nominating people who the ABA doesn’t feel are qualified, and that view becomes public. It seems like Trump’s had more poorly reviewed nominees than Obama because Obama didn’t actually nominate his poorly reviewed candidates.
Of course, that doesn’t exactly absolve Trump. Obama possibly chose not to nominate those candidates not because he wanted to avoid the black mark of a poor rating, but because they were poorly rated.
Trump pressed forward anyway. While it’s possible that other presidents have advanced more people who were rated as not qualified, by actually nominating his picks, TRUMP IS MORE LIKELY TO HAVE "NOT QUALIFIED" PEOPLE ACTUALLY CONFIRMED BY THE SENATE. (emphasis mine)."
----------------------
The judge in this case is clearly "Not Qualified"...btw, she didn't even allow for arguments on the case...not sure how someone with zero medical or epidemiological experience can do that...unless that doesn't even matter to her "Judgement".
Link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2017/11/10/how-unusual-are-trumps-not-qualified-judicial-nominations/