UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

their part. For myself, I make a point of reading/viewing what people post and link...oftentimes enabling me to point out more clearly where I believe they are mistaken (just ask Baron)...we come together on this "Open Forum" and share thoughts/opinions...hopefully in a convincing manner...that's what "Links" are for, so I use them...if you believe in good dialogue, you'll read my posts/links as I do yours and others....sound reasonable to you?

As to your asking for my opinion...I agree wholeheartedly with the authors of the linked articles...plus, they go into the issue in more detail and with more insight due to their professional backgrounds than I could...therefore, you are getting a much deeper understanding of what I believe in...and frankly much more than you are providing...which from my vantage point is simply one man's not very well informed opinion.

btw, here's a prime example of using "Judicial Prudence" when deciding who to vote for...we both recognize by now, I trust, that DJT is a malignant narcissist who only seeks to serve himself and is totally unqualified to be the nation's #1 Public Servant...although he says he's "Pro-Life", he has also shown himself to be not only morally corrupt, but a sycophant for our most dangerous foe (Putin), and IMO (with emerging evidence) the planner of a seditious insurrection to overturn our democracy...so, while we all want fewer abortions, many, if not a majority of Americans would be right not to vote for him in 2024, even if he continued to espouse a "Pro-Life" stance...because of the more pressing danger to our country and the rest of the free world....That's how "Judicial Prudence" is exercised in the voting booth...it's the candidate 'In Toto' that Catholics - and all voters - need to assess