Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
Football
2023 Notre Dame Football Schedule
2023 Notre Dame Roster
2022 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
Injury News & Updates
Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
Notre Dame Transfers
NFL Fighting Irish
Game Archive
Player Archive
Past Seasons & Results
Recruiting
Commits
News & Rumors
Class of 2018 Commit List
Class of 2019 Commit List
Class of 2020 Commit List
Class of 2021 Commit List
Archives
History
Notre Dame Bowl History
Notre Dame NFL Draft History
Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
Notre Dame Football National Championships
Notre Dame Football Rivalries
Notre Dame Stadium
Touchdown Jesus
Basketball
Forums
Chat Room
Football Forum
Open Forum
Basketball Board
Ticket Exchange
Videos
Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
Notre Dame Football Highlights
Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
Notre Dame Player Highlights
Hype Videos
Latest News
Gear
About
Advertise With Us
Contact Us
Our RSS Feeds
Community Rules
Privacy Policy
RSS
YouTube
Twitter
Facebook
Home
>
Forums
>
The Open Forum
Login
|
Register
Username
Password
Remember me
Sign in
Conor's brave stand is based upon the fact
Author:
Iggle
(11153 Posts - Joined: Sep 14, 2007)
Posted at 10:08 am on May 15, 2022
View All
That whomever would be forced to resign would be replaced by a progressive justice. Zero risk.
Replies to: "Conor's brave stand is based upon the fact"
Still leaking at SCOTUS.
[NT]
[
LINK
]
-
BaronVonZemo
- 12:38am 5/15/22
(14)
[View All]
Do you agree that the leaker’s Justice should resign from the Court?
-
conorlarkin
- 9:37am 5/15/22
No, of course not. The leaker should be punished. Soto is safe unless she participated.
-
BaronVonZemo
- 1:30pm 5/15/22
No.
-
MAS
- 9:45am 5/15/22
Conor's brave stand is based upon the fact
-
Iggle
- 10:08am 5/15/22
Heh. Good point. He would not be saying that if we had a GOP president.
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 5:59pm 5/15/22
Never entered my mind who would appoint the next Justice.
-
conorlarkin
- 10:10pm 5/15/22
Correct.
[NT]
-
jakers
- 10:20am 5/15/22
I made my stand on the matter.
[NT]
-
conorlarkin
- 9:50am 5/15/22
Remember - the first leak was to the WSJ
-
Chris94
- 9:08am 5/15/22
Turn it inside out and point back. Predictable.
[NT]
-
BaronVonZemo
- 1:32pm 5/15/22
And you know this how? Or is it just another of you SWAG's that
-
ColeyO
- 10:58am 5/15/22
Yale and Harvard Law are really pumping out the lawyers with the utmost integrity.
-
JarHead4ND
- 3:17am 5/15/22
Good post. Fully agree. Did not know that about Garland’s daughter and the SCOTUS.
[NT]
-
BaronVonZemo
- 8:26am 5/15/22
Garland's son-in-law, Xan Tanner, is making a fortune peddling CRT educational programs .
-
Irishize
- 9:22am 5/15/22