Point to one post of mine where I cared to wade into the "assault weapon" or "assault rifle" semantic argument. You could quote 1000 generals about bullshit that I don't disagree with, but simply don't care about. I know what an AR-15 is, I don't want one and if I was king Ramos wouldn't have had one either.
But what does this have to do with my original post you responded to?
I tried to meet you halfway, what part of this post do you disagree with?
"1. What point do you think you're making about semiautomatic mode? Everyone knows ARs are semiautomatic, they don't have modes like their military equivalent, M-16s, they have one mode. Really not sure what your point is. Are you trying to say that because the military uses their fully automatics in semi-automatic mode (there's a third mode, 3 shot bursts, btw) that they are functionally the same? Okay, it's wrong, but whatever and I don't care because it isn't material to any point I have made, it is wholly irrelevant to our conversation."