Just questioning whether or not someone as high profile as Dershowitz would just make something up outta whole cloth.
Couldn't you say "cutting" and editing is a difference without a distinction? And if you have 6 episodes of two plus hours of "hearings" is it unreasonable to play the entire speech? I mean if we're trying to find out the truth of all this? 28 minutes seems a pretty short.
I'm not looking to fight with you. I'm just saying it opens the hearings up to questions of legitimacy and accuracy. And it being "produced" in prime time casts it in a further suspicious light. Just my opinion. I have no doubt you'll disagree!