Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
Football
2023 Notre Dame Football Schedule
2023 Notre Dame Roster
2022 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
Injury News & Updates
Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
Notre Dame Transfers
NFL Fighting Irish
Game Archive
Player Archive
Past Seasons & Results
Recruiting
Commits
News & Rumors
Class of 2018 Commit List
Class of 2019 Commit List
Class of 2020 Commit List
Class of 2021 Commit List
Archives
History
Notre Dame Bowl History
Notre Dame NFL Draft History
Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
Notre Dame Football National Championships
Notre Dame Football Rivalries
Notre Dame Stadium
Touchdown Jesus
Basketball
Forums
Chat Room
Football Forum
Open Forum
Basketball Board
Ticket Exchange
Videos
Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
Notre Dame Football Highlights
Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
Notre Dame Player Highlights
Hype Videos
Latest News
Gear
About
Advertise With Us
Contact Us
Our RSS Feeds
Community Rules
Privacy Policy
RSS
YouTube
Twitter
Facebook
Home
>
Forums
>
The Open Forum
Login
|
Register
Username
Password
Remember me
Sign in
Not an intelligent reply. They did for a circuit judge, R's did it for SCOTUS. Wanna revise?
Author:
Quest4twelve
(4794 Posts - Joined: Aug 5, 2015)
Posted at 6:13 pm on Jun 11, 2022
View All
(no message)
Replies to: "Not an intelligent reply. They did for a circuit judge, R's did it for SCOTUS. Wanna revise?"
If any party has the WH, House but less than 60 seats in the Senate do they
-
Quest4twelve
- 5:12pm 6/11/22
(7)
[View All]
D's were ready to use"nuclear option" on BBB&court packing, but couldn't get to 50 in your own party
-
BaronVonZemo
- 7:41pm 6/11/22
Yes...except the present one because..
-
BaronVonZemo
- 7:29pm 6/11/22
Agreed. And thank god or the nation would be like California
-
Curly1918
- 5:57pm 6/11/22
A 3rd party (or 4th) is badly needed.
[NT]
-
jakers
- 5:39pm 6/11/22
The dems are known for going nuclear, see H Reid
[NT]
-
holybull101
- 5:15pm 6/11/22
Not an intelligent reply. They did for a circuit judge, R's did it for SCOTUS. Wanna revise?
[NT]
-
Quest4twelve
- 6:13pm 6/11/22
So, you agree with his point, but you are embarrassed enough to try to diminish it.
[NT]
-
NedoftheHill
- 7:32pm 6/11/22