I was clear, and you misstated my position. I absolutely disagree that rape or incest are justifications for the murder of an innocent human being. There is no justification for intentionally engaging in an act of killing an innocent human being, where the primary goal of the act is to kill that innocent human being.
I was clear on that.
I then said that for the sake of this discussion, we should assume the opposite of that. Assume that the GOP is willing to accept that abortion is a right in cases of rape and incest in, say, California, but that in other cases, they want parental notice, or to restrict abortion after viability in all cases, or to make abortions a procedure to be carried out only in a certain level of medical facility, or whatever. Is there any restriction you would accept?...any restriction? After all, if you are not willing to grant any restrictions on the majority of abortions, then your emphasis on these special cases is just a debating tactic, and you actually just like all abortions, not the special case abortions. I will ask again the question you dodged: Are there any restrictions that you would accept on non-rape, non-incest abortion? Where would you draw the line? When can a baby not be killed? partial birth? umbilical cord cut?