With regard to your list, that is most of what you listed. The exception would be morning after pill and IUD which both have prevention of implantation as the primary mechanism of action…thus they take a life already conceived which infringes on the right to life of that being.
Regarding In Vitro fertilization - it can be done ethically without infringing on the right to life. It used to be back in the day that every embryo fertilized was implanted. Then they got into making many more embryos than would ever be used, and the demand dropped when everyone else was doing the same thing. Then they just started tossing the frozen embryos when the couple got tired of paying the monthly storage bill….something everyone knew would happen.
Further, when they discovered that they could implant 5 embryos and get better fertility rates per ovulation cycle to post online which improved the business of a particular Repro Endo office, they started doing this and then simply started doing a “selective reduction” of the high risk multiple, multiple gestation…..put in five embryos, and set up a procedure to suck out 3 of them later at the end of the first trimester or early second trimester and get great success rates to advertise desperate couples. Of course, after intentionally creating the dangerous high risk situation of high risk multiples, they counseled about the danger and recommended selective reduction to avoid potential problems.
Implant what you create, and never implant more than 2 ormtheee and live with having to do an extra cycle now and again rather than take human life…pretty simple.
All of the other stuff you listed doesn’t compromise the life another human being so I would accept whatever the voters decide…..but I would certainly fight within the rules to get the result I hope for leading up to a vote.