and defend himself, instead of pouting off in a corner and relying on you do do his bidding.
Now to your comments...I'll intersperse my replies to them below...
"Baron actually said there was no allocation in the infrastructure bill to protect the grid given...that we'll now be placing dependence on it for everything."
---------------
Baron could have taken the time to find out if the Biden admin was doing anything in the area of cyber security for our electrical grid...he did not...this is IMO willful ignorance on a topic he felt was important enough to bring to everyone's attention...can only guess why the thought never crossed his mind
---------------
"I am only speaking to your response where you tout Biden as having a plan. You, at that time, cited a report relying on "two unnamed people" who said a DRAFT plan was being worked on and could be released in 5 days. (That was about two weeks ago.)"
---------------
I cited a Bloomberg article penned by two of their reporters...btw, I think it's a safe bet they would be fired for falsely claiming such an effort was underway when it wasn't. The following subsequent reports by other sources show their article was indeed factual...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/04/20/cybersecurity-202-biden-administration-rolls-out-100-day-plan-improve-electric-grid-cybersecurity/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/markweatherford/2021/04/26/the-biden-administrations-100-day-plan-for-power-grid-cybersecurity/?
https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/20/politics/biden-electricity-grid-cybersecurity/index.htm
lhttps://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/549188-biden-administration-kicks-off-100-day-plan-to-shore-up-cybersecurity-of
----------------
"So, being honest, a plan is still in the works and is overdue according to that anonymously sourced report which you billed as "incontrovertible evidence"."
-----------------
First, take another look at the sources listed above...a plan is indeed being developed...and given that there was an earlier report from Bloomberg in mid-March (check it out yourself)...it was already underway only one month after Biden's administration took over...it is "incontrovertible" that Biden's admin had grid security at the top of their "To Do" list.
Second...Baron has never owned up to this fact and even "tweaked" his post to acknowledge his error.
-----------------
"You misrepresented the "plan" and continue to do so now raising "security concerns" as the reason it's not available. You just made that up as an excuse of course.."
-----------------
You've got to be kidding..."any reasonable person (from Sidney Powell)" would know that I was expressing my thoughts on whether the 'details' of such a plan would ever be shown to the public...even you admitted that "certain specifics would and should be classified"...that's all I was saying...again, this announcement was made less than two months into the new admin...and so, I did not 'misrepresent the plan'.
-----------------
"Last time it was supposed to out within 5 days if not sooner. I get that certain specifics would and should be classified. That doesn't mean the "plan" can not be disclosed in part. It was going to be disclosed? According to the incontrovertible story, right? Now it can't?"
-----------------
By now, I would hope you've grasped the fact that a serious effort is underway by the Biden admin to address cyber security for our electrical grid...within one month of taking office...to expect a fully developed plan in this time frame is ludicrous and disingenuous for anyone to make such a statement.
----------------
"Again, the mere existence of a "draft plan" doesn't mean we are protected or that it is remotely adequate. No one has the slightest idea...least of all you since you're acting as a cheerleader here."
----------------
We know there is a Plan...is it finished?...is it robust enough?..."No one (outside the Biden administration) has the slightest idea"...at this point in time, I agree with you.
----------------
"If the plan rivals Biden's border plan...it is nonexistent. I hope, whenever it shows up, that it's comprehensive and adequate, as the security concerns are monumental and any failure in that regard would be cataclysmic once as our dependence continues to grow."
----------------
I agree with you...it's VERY important. BTW, this threat of cyber attacks on our electrical grid didn't just show up on January 20, 2021...ask yourself if you can recall any announcement of an initiative by the former administration.
----------------
"As an aside, you showed up here stating your major concern was promoting Nuclear Energy...yet as Biden reveals himself to be a mouthpiece for a hard left Progressive agenda you're still invested in propping him up at seemingly every turn knowing that group has little use for your former pet concern.
----------------
I am still wary of 'Anti-Nukes' who have lobbied Bernie Sanders and others, and am doing what I can to ensure that the U.S. does not adopt a 100% Wind/Solar/Hydro strategy, to the exclusion of a significant amount of nuclear power to provide reliability...I am hopeful that Biden's admin agrees...there are indications that this is the case...see the link below...
https://www.utilitydive.com/news/nuclear-has-another-friend-in-biden-but-changes-at-the-nrc-could-mean-more/593609/
Ok...those are my responses...again, please B-Mail Baron to defend his own positions/statements...but in the meantime, you might want to consider "Choosing your friends (more) wisely".