it is for me, so thanks. (also thanks for 'reminding me' to try out the text coloring ;-)).
What I'm hearing from you is...I tend to append links without a sufficient 'Abstract' to help you decide whether or not you should delve into it, and given your time constraints that puts you off...am I getting "warm"? If that is the case, I'll try to provide more "Clift Notes" regarding those reports, but don't forget that they typically have their own (Abstracts)...
That being said, it is totally up to you as to whether you avail yourself of the material, plus you can quit reading anytime you wish...there is literally no way I could force compliance...While I did take the time to seek-out helpful - and credible - documentation, hoping that it adds clarity and believability, I know some will not take the time as I do, to read it. This notion of "Homework Assignments" is beginning to look like a well-worn "trope", but it's your call on that.
BTW, in the technical world I was brought up in (e.g. Nuclear Reactors), any device or system changes that I wanted to implement needed to be presented to a Review Board of experts within the company in the various fields of structures, heat transfer, nuclear physics, manufacturing, quality control, licensing, etc....so just having an "opinion" was never my "go to" strategy for approval...I always brought data...perhaps that approach has stayed with me and partly explains why I append so many journal articles...they may sound like "Assignments", but I'm just trying to provide more than a simple opinion.
Let me know if you see any progress here.