I read it prior to responding, and what I said was that was the most important paragraph, not that it was the only paragraph, or that I stopped at that paragraph. The article, like you, decides that because one new study has the results that they want, they are willing to throw out at least 29 previous studies that showed what they didn't want. I would say that the mountain of evidence to the other side, that it has little to no impact, would at least give you pause to consider that maybe the new one is the outlier. That would be the rational way to look at it, which is why your silly diagnosis of me falls flat. I'll take it as you just trying to be funny, rather than an insult.
The schizophrenia portion was not me trying to reclassify it out of left field, and you trying to say it was is either intellectually dishonest or a lack of reading skills. It was an example to show that this is not the only mental disorder to cause a break from reality. We don't indulge other breaks from reality, and we shouldn't do it with gender dysphoria. The brain has not finished developing until around age 25. We give people adult status at age 18, which is likely too early to really make this choice, in my opinion, as is also evident by the growing voices of former trans people who are coming out against it after finally realizing that they really aren't what they thought they were. But you probably don't listen to them since they don't say what you agree with.
Go watch the Manti documentary and come back and tell me how much the person who catfished him was then and currently is in their right mind and completely grounded in reality.