Whether DOJ chooses to file an indictment is a different question than the lawfulness of the SW.

| Register

Whether DOJ chooses to file an indictment is a different question than the lawfulness of the SW.

Author: conorlarkin (21053 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 1:39 pm on Aug 24, 2022

View All

You assume there were shenanigans, which would then include Attorney General Garland and the federal magistrate who authorized the search of a former Presidents' private residence.

I do not make such an assumption. Quite the contrary.

Trump has plenty of available remedies to challenge an unlawful search warrant or seek other relief. If he is successful on that front, we can all applaud your scholarly analysis.

The American Dream belongs to all of us. — Kamala Harris

Replies to: "Whether DOJ chooses to file an indictment is a different question than the lawfulness of the SW."

Mar-a-lago warrant has no legal basis per 2 Constitutional lawyers-their explanation [NT] [LINK] - BaronVonZemo - 1:12pm 8/24/22 (25) [View All]
- Wait someone on here said it would not take a Constitutional Lawyer to figure this stuff out. [NT] - JarHead4ND - 9:58pm 8/24/22
  - To be specific, JH, in that other thread, I noted that two 'Constitutional Lawyers' suggested that - TyroneIrish - 1:30am 8/25/22
    - The PRA Code is more like guidelines, the rest is silent. [NT] - JarHead4ND - 2:19am 8/25/22
      - Am I wrong in assuming that NARA takes ownership as soon as - TyroneIrish - 11:45am 8/25/22
        Yes assume but I'll raise you briefs filed and arguments made during hearings by opposing litigants - JarHead4ND - 7:32pm 8/25/22
  - That was Tyrone. He's an effing wingnut. [NT] - Stark Raving Dad - 10:11pm 8/24/22
- Wouldn't it make sense for Trump to join media's motion to unseal the affidavit? - conorlarkin - 1:25pm 8/24/22
  - To your question- the DOJ gets to redact in whatever manner they choose.Such a release could hurt DT [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 1:34pm 8/24/22
    - The DOJ has pledged to redact everything that won't be leaked to the NYT or WaPo [NT] - Iggle - 2:10pm 8/24/22
  - If you cannot access the WSJ,at least read my response to Chris below. From legal standing viewpoint - BaronVonZemo - 1:29pm 8/24/22
    - Whether DOJ chooses to file an indictment is a different question than the lawfulness of the SW. - conorlarkin - 1:39pm 8/24/22
      - Given Garland is the most political position in the entire DOJ, I would expect him to be involved [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 3:17pm 8/24/22
- Must....defend.....leader.... [NT] - Chris94 - 1:20pm 8/24/22
  - Are you talking about Baron or the WSJ? I remember you telling me "I report, you decide". Isn't [LINK] - TampaIrish - 1:55pm 8/24/22
    - Hunter swiped his muffuletta out of the faculty fridge again. Chris is just hangry. [NT] - Stark Raving Dad - 2:58pm 8/24/22
  - PS -one of us is also defending unprecedented behavior by DOJ where questions haven't been answered - BaronVonZemo - 1:31pm 8/24/22
  - I thought it interesting. It still matter to me if he had unacceptable documents. But still, it - BaronVonZemo - 1:25pm 8/24/22
    - He...must...defend...Biden.... [NT] - NedoftheHill - 2:14pm 8/24/22
      - I criticized Biden in the thread below this one. I'm happy to do it when I disagree. [NT] - Chris94 - 3:00pm 8/24/22
        Oh...so if we criticize Trump once, we aren't in the cult? Important to know. - NedoftheHill - 4:25pm 8/24/22
        Nor me. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 6:39pm 8/24/22
        Oh, you both are cult members indeed. Baron being an Imperial Wizard - jimbasil - 3:42am 8/25/22
        
        Neither of you have JimB's promise to exclude you from the cult. [NT] - JarHead4ND - 10:06pm 8/24/22
        He just weighed in, lol. I get to be a wizard. [NT] - BaronVonZemo - 9:13am 8/25/22
        “Imperial” wizard. Just make sure you take your hood off - jimbasil - 10:33am 8/25/22