And you are using a link that is over a year old. Let's try a different tack, since for some strange reason you refuse to read Dr. Risch's paper.
1 - According to Dr. Risch's extensive research, the RCTs showing HCQ+ to be ineffective weren't parallel to the way it's supposed to be used (on vulnerable patients within 5 days of symptom onset). Is that true or not?
2 - According to Dr. Risch, not one RCT was ever conducted using HCQ+ the way it's supposed to be used. Is that true or not?
3 - According to Dr. Risch, every credible observational trial shows efficacy far and above the standard treatment. Is that true or not?
If all of the above are true (and according to Dr. Risch they are), what would the logical conclusion be?