Ty, you're now just being a stubborn butthead about this. Dr. Risch has repeatedly addressed WHY the studies showing it to be ineffective are flawed. If you would quit being so stubborn and READ his research paper, you might learn something.
Also, the thought that HCQ caused cardiac problems has been discredited, and the study/article claiming it to be problematic was long ago withdrawn. So here's the deal. 1) I pointed out three pertinent facts about HCQ+ studies and asked you what the logical conclusion would be. You have now twice dodged the question. 2) You have still yet to read Dr. Risch's research paper. You are now officially in little-kid-plugs-his-ears-and-hums-so-he-doesn't-have-to-listen territory.
I am imploring you to read the paper and answer the question. If you still fail to do so, there is zero reason to give you any credibility on anything you say about this. As I've looked at EVERYTHING you have linked to, for you to refuse to read Dr. Risch's paper is nothing short of an utter disdain for honest conversation.