The fact is (and I don't care what your educational or professional background is), you are like a little kid whose mind is made up, puts his ears in his fingers and starts humming loudly.
You are beyond ridiculous to not even contemplating reading the paper. Risch lays out a logical case why HCQ+ works and why the debunkers are wrong. I also asked you what, if all the credible observational trials showed it worked, the RCTs showing it didn't weren't parallel with the way it was supposed to be used, and not one RCT was conducted in parallel manner, would your logical conclusion be. Tellingly, on multiple occasions you refused to answer.
The fact is, as others have pointed out, you are close-minded and lack the ability to think critically and logically. So you resort to staying in your safe space of ignorance for comfort.