Like, the odds truly defy how frequently he has underperformed vs. the points spread in Vegas. Someone once posted a blurb about it in a column, and it should have gotten national attention, because it was such an amazing disparity. You might chalk that up to the "Notre Dame is frequently overrated" party line, but this isn't an A.P. Poll done by idiots who don't watch the games. It's done by professionals who are trying to set a spread that evens most of the wagers and makes them money. And he is very, very frequently worse than those projections.