and misrepresenting the analysis as saying the player “sucks.” I’m not rooting for any particular QB to win the job. I just watched and listened to the linked analysis and commented on it. Wimbush looked bad on the few minutes we saw. No dispute. The analyst said that and noted he had a good day before. None of it means he sucks or has improved. And it won’t mean Book “sucks” when he has a bad few throws. Or Jurkovec. Nobody concluded he “sucks” when he had an awful performance at the Army Bowl, . . at least I hope nobody did.