I'm not defending the NCAA which has been consistent in it's inconsistency but I don't think Gilman has anything to complain about. One may disagree with NCAA's rationale for what construes a hardship but apparently not being able to enhance your chance at a pro career isn't a hardship. Not rapping on Gilman's choice just that I don't think he was screwed by the NCAA. There was no pre-text that the only reason for the transfer was a chance at a pro career. That isn't a "hardship" in the eyes of the NCAA. It isn't a sick relative, a career move by a parent or a coaching change.
This message has been edited 2 time(s).