You made a series of statements above about the offense that a number of posters then demonstrated were completely false by simply providing examples of direct evidence (in the form of easily observable facts [initial offensive plays from scrimmage] and easily accessible data [total rushing yardage and per carry averages]), yet you're the one accusing said posters of (1) being unable to argue with logic and proof (neither of which you've provided at any point in this exchange) and (2) resorting to childishness, at which point you then call one of the posters an "asshole" after having previously referred to said poster as a "complete dip shit"?
So, given your voluminous posting history, what's your real agenda here?