How am I not being reasonable? You are pitching the motivation of “one of the greatest upsets in sports history” going into the Clemson game. I think it’s a bad idea. I just saw on another board that FEI projects ND losing by 4. S&P has Clemson by 8. Yeah, ND is the underdog. But hardly a Douglas/Tyson level underdog. Oklahoma is a bigger point spread dog in round one than ND. Is it unreasonable for me to think framing this as David v Goliath story is the wrong approach for this team? I’m not going to stoop to name calling, but it is kind of rich for you to call me a “blockhead,” then claim I’m the one who cannot be reasonable. You saw “30 for 30” and you tried to connect it to this year’s ND team. You are free to do that. But I’m not going to apologize for seeing this differently. I’m not trying to be a dick. I just honestly think the worst thing Kelly could do would be to play into the narrative that it’d be a Douglas/Tyson type miracle for this team to win.