Actually not a badmodel

| Register

Actually not a badmodel

Author: 86domer (401 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 1:41 pm on Jan 8, 2019

View All

In this instance the early ND "close wins" count against them and hold them back.

If you look at the right hand column, which provides greater weight to games late in the season ND is 4 and Michigan is 22.

To me, seems pretty fair.

Go Irish

Replies to: "Actually not a badmodel"

Final Sagarin rankings have ND at 7–behind Michigan at 6 [NT] [LINK] - Shadow_of_the_Dome - 11:09am 1/8/19 (13) [View All]
- Another broken model. That's absurd... [NT] - TakethetrainKnute - 11:25am 1/8/19
  - Surprised he doesn't still have Bama ahead of Clemson...wonder how betting agencies who already paid - Chrisb - 11:55am 1/8/19
    - Oh, yeah . . . I kinda forgot about that early payout thing. - Napoleon - 12:02pm 1/8/19
      - Exactly. It was a publicity calculation and they only paid out the pre-season bettors. [NT] - TakethetrainKnute - 12:05pm 1/8/19
  - 8-5 Mississippi State checks in at #8. - Napoleon - 11:33am 1/8/19
    - ...been saying that for a long time. His ""ranking"" is complete garbage unless its used for what - Chrisb - 11:58am 1/8/19
      - Is it not "garbage" as a betting data base? - Napoleon - 12:00pm 1/8/19
        Actually not a badmodel - 86domer - 1:41pm 1/8/19
        That makes it seem even dumber. - Napoleon - 3:17pm 1/8/19
        It is just the math... guess we disagree - 86domer - 10:30am 1/9/19
        If it has UM ahead of ND at the end, it's retarded. - Napoleon - 11:41am 1/9/19
        ^^^This^^^ [NT] - Chrisb - 4:38pm 1/9/19
        
        Re: Actually not a bad model [NT] - 86domer - 1:42pm 1/8/19