Funny, I always thought stability was an asset.
Clemson, Oklahoma and Ohio State don't have unusually high coaching turnover. If you look at who Saban hires, the fact that he has high turnover isn't surprising and has more to do with their backgrounds that the fact that Saban is known to work his staffs hard (i.e. all day Christmas day) than it is because Saban has a winning program.
Until you are ready to present some data beyond another one of your invented theories, they are nothing more than just that: your invented theories. You could probably get a job at Bleacher Report.
This message has been edited 1 time(s).