End goal, yes. Agree.

Author: Napoleon (2719 Posts - Joined: Apr 23, 2015)
Posted at 7:31 pm on Feb 8, 2019

I’ll put it this way: same bottom line motivation, but different reasons. Fields chose to go to a place where a 5* QB was already on the roster. Nothing changed . . . he just didn’t win the job. The Academy literally changed the rules on Gilman after he showed up. I don’t mind either kid getting to play immediately, but I simply can’t reconcile that Fields was allowed to play immediately and Gilman wasn’t. There is no way I can see that as equitable.

This message has been edited 1 time(s).

Replies to: "End goal, yes. Agree."