That should have been your take from the start. Would have led to less resistance. You instead declared that Jurkovec should be #1 going into spring. Which is different from what you and I just agreed on. Regarding Kelly giving Jurkovec a fair shot . . . I guess you can think what you want. I think it is a tough position to defend when Kelly replaced his highly touted recruit with a high ceiling last season after a few games. You are right, though, that it is easier to stick with the incumbent. Kelly still made the switch, while undefeated and just a few weeks after beating Michigan. I think it would be easier for Kelly to switch to Jurkovec, a highly touted recruit with a high ceiling this coming year.