You conflated my response to the statement that he was "unremarkable" with the fact that he has a nickname, making him rather remarkable, as evidence of him being "polarizing", which isn't what it was meant to be. In my experience, based on board response to whenever his name comes up and reactions to him on twitter whenever I mention him, he's the most polarizing player of the Kelly era. A lot of people like him, a lot of people hate him.
As for the headline, it should have said called plays, not called games. I'll agree with that. I also think you have common sense, and when I say in the piece that this doesn't prove anything, it's just evidence of his aptitude, you understand where I'm going with it.
And no, running RPO's, or the option, or going through progressions on a pass play, is not akin to completely changing the play at the LOS based on a defensive set. And if it was the same then we'd have seen Kizer, Golson, Wimbush, and Book do it. But they didn't. They looked towards the sideline first. But, Rees didn't do that because he was smart enough to make those audibles himself. Which was the whole point of the piece.