Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
Football
2023 Notre Dame Football Schedule
2023 Notre Dame Roster
2022 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
Injury News & Updates
Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
Notre Dame Transfers
NFL Fighting Irish
Game Archive
Player Archive
Past Seasons & Results
Recruiting
Commits
News & Rumors
Class of 2018 Commit List
Class of 2019 Commit List
Class of 2020 Commit List
Class of 2021 Commit List
Archives
History
Notre Dame Bowl History
Notre Dame NFL Draft History
Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
Notre Dame Football National Championships
Notre Dame Football Rivalries
Notre Dame Stadium
Touchdown Jesus
Basketball
Forums
Chat Room
Football Forum
Open Forum
Basketball Board
Ticket Exchange
Videos
Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
Notre Dame Football Highlights
Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
Notre Dame Player Highlights
Hype Videos
Latest News
Gear
About
Advertise With Us
Contact Us
Our RSS Feeds
Community Rules
Privacy Policy
RSS
YouTube
Twitter
Facebook
Home
>
Forums
>
Football Message Board
Login
|
Register
Username
Password
Remember me
Sign in
Proof that lower stars have more desire. Less interested in glamor and more interested in the craft.
Author:
oldirish
(8711 Posts - Joined: Oct 8, 2011)
Posted at 8:28 am on Jan 24, 2020
View All
We've seen this play out numerous times at ND as well.
This message has been edited 1 time(s).
Replies to: "Proof that lower stars have more desire. Less interested in glamor and more interested in the craft."
High School recruiting rankings of Super Bowl starting lineups
-
Nigel Tufnel
- 10:57am 1/23/20
(15)
[View All]
Proves development is a major factor. Plus there aren’t that many 5 stars.
[NT]
-
Frank L
- 10:21am 1/27/20
And there are about 5x as many 3 stars as 4 and 5.
-
LanceHarbor
- 5:26am 1/24/20
Proof that lower stars have more desire. Less interested in glamor and more interested in the craft.
-
oldirish
- 8:28am 1/24/20
Probably not
-
Nigel Tufnel
- 11:38am 1/24/20
Re: Probably not
-
oldirish
- 6:13pm 1/24/20
huh?
[NT]
-
LanceHarbor
- 9:02am 1/24/20
Re: huh?
-
oldirish
- 6:20pm 1/24/20
I'll say it again. Star rankings don't mean crap. It's service. A fee to charge recruits and schools
[NT]
-
oldirish
- 10:56pm 1/23/20
This a CF site--How do the numbers line up?
[NT]
-
Hank the Tank
- 8:51pm 1/23/20
Not a lot of value in a premature rating system, kids are going to be developed past their star
-
holybull101
- 9:09pm 1/23/20
Based on this, the NFL will struggle to recruit talent.
[NT]
-
iairishcheeks
- 11:39am 1/23/20
Or development with the right recruit pays dividends
[NT]
-
whatsamataU
- 12:23pm 1/23/20
Guessing this is statistically accurate
-
NDNEIL
- 11:43am 1/23/20
Especially RBs.
-
iairishcheeks
- 12:40pm 1/23/20
Thx, interesting info
[NT]
-
ColeyO
- 11:26am 1/23/20