Aside from the grammar errors, that are annoying but can be overlooked, some of it is just wrong, in my opinion.
The statement that youth football in Chicagoland does not act as development and feeder programs for the high schools is just false. Virtually all of the top programs use their youth system in that very manner. Development of those that are playing is not the big problem.
The problem with high school football in the Chicago area comes down to one thing. The majority of the top athletes do not play football any longer.
Football participation is down across all ages. Chicago has always been, and is now, a basketball first area. But now, year round AAU play, and particularly fall leagues prevent play in both sports. On top of that, there are more options for fall. Soccer has risen tremendously in the area over the last couple decades. More athletes playing soccer takes away from football, especially at the skill positions.
Even the catholic schools, which used to dominate the state in football, and where most of the Notre Dame players have come from in the past, have seen their numbers dwindle. Catholic schools have become better at the other fall and winter sports. So, safety concerns and the increase of other options for good athletes have combined to limit the number of top players in the area. I don't see this changing.