a portion of it or not.
Why should some kid who worked their tail off to get into a great academic instituion be rejected while another kid who didn't do as well gets the spot because they can hit a tennis ball?
If the kid brings value to the school....let's say a gold medal, then sure. But 99% don't do that in these lesser sports. The present systemis just a way to extend the benefit of being a jock beyond high school into the rest of life.
These people are undeserving of taking a classroom desk away from a more qualified person just as those more talented students should not take the spot of the better player on a rec league field hockey roster.....again, unless they bring some real value to the school.
This message has been edited 1 time(s).