All in all, I guess we just view it differently.
1. Re: Offensive live coaching. HH did coach 4 of last year's 5 offensive linemen. My point is they received more (and better) coaching from HH than they ever did from JQ. The criticism of JQ as OL coach isn't new. I haven't read any Jeff Driskel typical drivel so my comment isn't connected to that. I admit I expected the OL to get better as the year went on. They haven't and it is more than injuries considering the relatively weak schedule they have played. We'll see if they get any better after the off week.
2. No high quality qb is going to thrive is this lame-ass Kelly offense. It is abundantly clear to any one who watches this team in person. Any competent DC has no problem coaching against it; any good DC destroys it. It isn't a talent question as it is an offensive structure problem. The fact that it took a 5th year senior in the midst of his 3rd season starting and a weak schedule to be anywhere near successful shows how low brow and unadaptive this offense is.
3. There is a dearth of talent on the defense especially anywhere besides the DL. Any chance of being merely effective was dashed by injuries because they hit the position Freeman's defense is structured around. I not excusing Freeman but he is putting a new defense built around players that aren't experienced in it. I understand why the defense isn't particularly effective. You can't say that Quinn is new to this team or new to the players of new to the offense. 3 of the starters have at least 2 years under Quinn in the same system. A 4th, while a transfer, is in his 6th year of football. While we don't know why he isn't playing particularly well, you would think a decent OL coach could do something with that experience. So I see no reason to cut Quinn "slack" injuries aside.