I'm not talking about those of you who are commenting fairly on Freeman's performance so far, or about what Pyne has already done. I'm talking about the "I knew we never should have hired Freeman," etc., crowd, and the "Pyne is too short, too inaccurate, too unathletic to be a legit D1 QB at an elite school" crowd.
Freeman may turn out to be a bust, as might Pyne. I have no illusions. But come on. Freeman's just getting started. And Pyne has shown flashes of being very good.
This, I believe, is reflective of a society that demands instant results, or if someone doesn't immediately succeed then they'll never succeed, or if something isn't 100% great it's 100% crap.
I'm willing to give Freeman and Pyne some time before I make a judgment about them. Rees, on the other hand, is in charge of one of the worst-performing offenses in college football. He's been at this for three years, so there's been enough time to have an adequate body of work to judge. I still think he can be great, but he definitely has to change.