The receiver wasn’t defenseless and the crown of head wasn’t used. That seems like a bit one doesn’t want so change the same rule. Helmet to split hit is targeting period
This message has been edited 1 time(s).
Replies to: "The rules guy in the tv coverage agreed no targeting. Apparently"
- What is targeting if that was not? [NT]
- ShowMeIrish - 4:48pm 1/2/23
(8) [View All]
- Headscratcher on that one. [NT] - oldirish - 8:31pm 1/2/23
- Most ridiculous rule in college football. Just get rid of it, because they can't get it right even - guiness4everyone - 4:50pm 1/2/23
- The rules guy in the tv coverage agreed no targeting. Apparently - ndphysics - 4:58pm 1/2/23
- Do you ever read what you write? [NT] - WoodstockIrish - 6:23pm 1/2/23
- The rules guy in the tv coverage agreed no targeting. Apparently - ndphysics - 4:58pm 1/2/23
- Dog shit officiating all game long. Also USCum never gets called for holding [NT]
- Jerseymick - 4:50pm 1/2/23
- Every team you watch that you don’t like hold all game long - WoodstockIrish - 4:56pm 1/2/23
- That doesn’t make it not true, hon [NT]
- Jerseymick - 5:01pm 1/2/23
- It does if you’re full of shit [NT] - WoodstockIrish - 6:24pm 1/2/23
- That doesn’t make it not true, hon [NT]
- Jerseymick - 5:01pm 1/2/23
- Every team you watch that you don’t like hold all game long - WoodstockIrish - 4:56pm 1/2/23