You are off on a severe tangent and need to realize or admit it. Wins and losses don't mean you did or didn't turn a program around. It means you are or are not a good coach. The only point that you're making is bad coaches get fired. That's obvious.
"Weis turned the rutter of a completely broken ship (the program)" -- it does not mean wins and losses. How does a turnaround start? With getting talent. Kelly taught the talent how to win. Weis was the first to get talent here in a long time.. AKA "turn the ship around". Weis did get more talent (by ratings) to walk through ND's doors than had in the previous 10-15 years. I gave you the facts. I don't know why you can't admit to that. Kelly was a better coach and continued getting talent here. But, by that time the ship was going in the right direction but was still bad and as you pointed out they had no idea how to win which is what Kelly brought. Weis was a bridge from terrible to good.
"and got the dilapidated dingy turned around." --- When Weis got here the cupboard was bare. Mostly unathletic and hardly talented guys. A few but not many at all.
I respect a lot of things you say but man this is baffling and my only hunch is you hate Weis which is fine but the facts are the facts. It's fine if you desire to ignore them. Just admit the vendetta.