There is very little continuity on his teams from year to year. It’s like starting over each time.

I don’t know what it is he is building to other than get the best players you can and see what happens.

I also don’t see a discernible coaching philosophy or strategy. I believe that Kelly for a long time was more wedded to his system than using the talent you have. So that was one extreme. Freeman seems to be the other in the sense that he doesn’t seem to have a system.

Anyway, I think we’re stuck with both and if Freeman gets his poop in a group and wins out, he’ll convert a lot ofskeptics.