They are harsh/tough, and who prefers subjective positivity that is willfully ignorant to core issues that are never solved because the root cause is never faced.
Why?
I’m on the objective truth side as long as you can support the said “truth” with facts, examples, and data and be able to have a give and take conversation that leads to a better outcome (potential solution) than exists.
This message has been edited 1 time(s).