You say you want to have a conversation of substance but you didn't respond to anything I said.

Author: wrdomerson (2145 Posts - Original UHND Member)
Posted at 10:08 pm on Sep 23, 2024

I was not happy with the game. I also had the here we go again feeling, especially when they botched the FG. That tainted the way anyone would feel about the win.

If you want to argue that Angeli is the better choice over Leonard, then answer I would go with things like his better passing would help keep the box clean for Love and Price in the same way Leonard's running keeps the defense honest. That would be a possible argument.

Instead you emote that I'm trying to paint things a certain way. I'm just telling you like I see it, which was what my first post was about. You don't like Leonard, you want Angeli, and essentially nothing will change that for you. If he puts up 300 yds passing on Louisville, you will have a reason and it will be an outlier that doesn't actually matter. It's ok if you have that opinion, but it doesn't make it true. Also, no I am not saying Leonard will throw for 300 yds.

If you really want to have a conversation about why Angeli is the better choice, then by all means lay it out. Tell me how his passing will be of more benefit than Leonard's legs and below average passing. Or continue emoting, up to you.


Replies to: "You say you want to have a conversation of substance but you didn't respond to anything I said."