I’d like to see more size/speed/depth on DL and a Kyle Hamilton level safety. With that, D could be close to elite.
The O is a much bigger issue and where I can see the vision for D, even if I may not entirely agree with it, the long-term offensive plan is in no way evident. QB and WR are the biggest issues, but I’m a little concerned that we may lose some of our recruiting edge at TE given our lack of passing game. There is no coherent offensive identity.
We’re much closer on D than O, but both have a way to go.
Replies to: "We’re much closer on D than O, but both have a way to go."
- Secondary played very well [LINK]
- ndunabomber - 12:24pm 9/29/24
(6) [View All]
- We’re much closer on D than O, but both have a way to go. - LanceManion - 12:53pm 9/29/24
- Missing three starters as killed the OL [NT] - Fisher01 - 7:02pm 9/29/24
- Kyle Hamilton was a freak. IMO,we have excellent safeties, and Schuler is already - ColeyO - 1:11pm 9/29/24
- Schumer had a good game, and I liked Bowen’s aggressiveness. [NT] - LanceManion - 2:04pm 9/29/24
- If the O was anywhere comparable to the D, we would be top 10. And if my aunt had balls, she’d be - Frank L - 1:04pm 9/29/24
- We have a top 10-15 D and a top 80 offense. Mind boggling. [NT] - LanceManion - 2:06pm 9/29/24
- We’re much closer on D than O, but both have a way to go. - LanceManion - 12:53pm 9/29/24