I assume there are no ranking caveats for auto bids
If we are in top 12 we are in. 15th or so depends on how many teams below us get auto bids
This message has been edited 1 time(s).
Replies to: "The issue here is auto bids for teams that might not be near the top 15"
- Any thoughts on the 4-4-2-2-1-3 model for the college football playoff? Only 3 at large bids for ND - Hibakusha - 7:01pm 6/6/25
(10) [View All]
- If I were king for a day, I’d go back to no playoffs, meaningful regular season games, and NY day - Shadow_of_the_Dome - 12:44am 6/8/25
- Hate it. Prefer the '4' model. - Nigel Tufnel - 5:14pm 6/7/25
- 16 equates to the Top 11.9% of FBS, while the NFL sends almost 44% of the league to the playoffs - Chrisb - 5:40pm 6/7/25
- Bullshit - Nigel Tufnel - 9:46pm 6/7/25
- 16 equates to the Top 11.9% of FBS, while the NFL sends almost 44% of the league to the playoffs - Chrisb - 5:40pm 6/7/25
- I like the 5+11 better, but considering the initial idea they floated was 5-5-2-2-1-1 - Chrisb - 4:26pm 6/7/25
- The issue here is auto bids for teams that might not be near the top 15 - ndphysics - 12:12pm 6/7/25
- Agree. [NT]
- Hibakusha - 1:17pm 6/7/25
- Re:Also Agree - nddad98 - 8:23pm 6/7/25
- If we have 2 losses and a decent schedule we likely get in most years. - ndphysics - 2:11pm 6/7/25
- Agree. [NT]
- Hibakusha - 1:17pm 6/7/25
- Not sure auto bids hurts ND. - AlbanyIRISH - 7:58am 6/7/25