which would have left ND "eligible" for only 1 of 16 spots, I'd say being eligible for 3 is much better.
Replies to: "I like the 5+11 better, but considering the initial idea they floated was 5-5-2-2-1-1"
- Any thoughts on the 4-4-2-2-1-3 model for the college football playoff? Only 3 at large bids for ND - Hibakusha - 7:01pm 6/6/25
(10) [View All]
- If I were king for a day, I’d go back to no playoffs, meaningful regular season games, and NY day - Shadow_of_the_Dome - 12:44am 6/8/25
- Hate it. Prefer the '4' model. - Nigel Tufnel - 5:14pm 6/7/25
- 16 equates to the Top 11.9% of FBS, while the NFL sends almost 44% of the league to the playoffs - Chrisb - 5:40pm 6/7/25
- Bullshit - Nigel Tufnel - 9:46pm 6/7/25
- 16 equates to the Top 11.9% of FBS, while the NFL sends almost 44% of the league to the playoffs - Chrisb - 5:40pm 6/7/25
- I like the 5+11 better, but considering the initial idea they floated was 5-5-2-2-1-1 - Chrisb - 4:26pm 6/7/25
- The issue here is auto bids for teams that might not be near the top 15 - ndphysics - 12:12pm 6/7/25
- Agree. [NT]
- Hibakusha - 1:17pm 6/7/25
- Re:Also Agree - nddad98 - 8:23pm 6/7/25
- If we have 2 losses and a decent schedule we likely get in most years. - ndphysics - 2:11pm 6/7/25
- Agree. [NT]
- Hibakusha - 1:17pm 6/7/25
- Not sure auto bids hurts ND. - AlbanyIRISH - 7:58am 6/7/25