I'm not defending the play of the defense but he "core" of the defense in 2024 was Kizer, Watts, Cross, and Mills. Between the 4 of them, there is a combined 22 years of college football. That is not easily replaced. While this team may be more talented than last year, it is not as experienced as the '24 team.
It was clear to me being at the game and seeing things you don't see on tv that the defense looked lost and unorganized in the 1st half. Yes that is on the coaches but they simply don't have those 4 guys around who by instinct knew how to set up the defense and react to what is happening on the field that is not easily replaced.
Replies to: "I would disagree that the "core" of the defense is back."
- Maybe the Press previously asked this question to MF, but I would love to hear his response to -- - NEPA Irish - 9:21am 9/14/25
(5) [View All]
- The best leaders put their people in positions to succeed - NDWisconsin - 9:55am 9/14/25
- I would disagree that the "core" of the defense is back. - D2 - 9:52am 9/14/25
- Don’t disagree with your point. Would we have seen a similar product if Golden was still here? - LanceManion - 9:57am 9/14/25
- Golden was also a part of the "core" of the defense. - D2 - 10:26am 9/14/25
- I agree. Double whammy of sorts with Golden leaving & personnel issues. [NT] - LanceManion - 11:22am 9/14/25
- Golden was also a part of the "core" of the defense. - D2 - 10:26am 9/14/25
- Don’t disagree with your point. Would we have seen a similar product if Golden was still here? - LanceManion - 9:57am 9/14/25