And keep them guessing who gets the ball and the other is the lead blocker.
We don’t spread them out so why worry about 3 guys in the backfield
This message has been edited 1 time(s).
Replies to: "100%. If u r going to tell everyone u r going to run it, put 2 backs with carr"
- Per MF at his presser. The Wildcat isn't going away. It's evolving. - ELP - 3:23pm 10/6/25
(13) [View All]
- True, if we can't shitcan it, at least make it useful. [NT] - DiscoRick - 2:40pm 10/7/25
- Into a House Cat? [NT] - TakethetrainKnute - 8:13pm 10/6/25
- It's a living, breathing formation. [NT]
- BaronVonZemo - 5:20pm 10/6/25
- That seems to be on life support. What is its success rate? [NT]
- ELP - 5:21pm 10/6/25
- Horrid. I don't like it. But apparently Love read it wrong & could have walked in....but.... - BaronVonZemo - 9:46am 10/7/25
- That seems to be on life support. What is its success rate? [NT]
- ELP - 5:21pm 10/6/25
- If Love takes it outside behind CJ's block, we're not sweating it so much [NT]
- jrdjr84 - 4:12pm 10/6/25
- I vote a resounding no on CJ blocking for that play. Unnecessary IMHO. [NT]
- ELP - 5:18pm 10/6/25
- 100%. If u r going to tell everyone u r going to run it, put 2 backs with carr - ndphysics - 6:22pm 10/6/25
- Re: 100%. If u r going to tell everyone u r going to run it, put 2 backs with carr - bleedbluebleedgold - 9:18am 10/7/25
- Re: I vote a resounding no on CJ blocking for that play. Unnecessary IMHO. [NT] - ELP - 5:20pm 10/6/25
- 100%. If u r going to tell everyone u r going to run it, put 2 backs with carr - ndphysics - 6:22pm 10/6/25
- I vote a resounding no on CJ blocking for that play. Unnecessary IMHO. [NT]
- ELP - 5:18pm 10/6/25
- It's evolving into an even bigger steaming pile. [NT] - LanceManion - 3:47pm 10/6/25
- He allowed the defense to look the way it did for the first 2.5 half games of the year. He's not in - WestCoastIrishFan - 3:27pm 10/6/25
- How long will it take to naturally evolve into a QB sneak? Or 2 backs with Carr in backfield? [NT] - ndphysics - 3:39pm 10/6/25