Oh, he must have had his hands inside the back of his helmet. Well, how could the ref who was 15 yard behind the QB and blind to the alleged action be in a position to make that call in the first place? Crickets.
When the "networks" have rules analysts on staff who are fact checkers for sports: highly dubious.
Replies to: "When the "networks" have rules analysts on staff who are fact checkers for sports: highly dubious."
- College Football Officiating - nd-usmc - 11:27am 11/2/25
(10) [View All]
- What national in scope organization would they work for (Can’t be the NCAA for any number of reasons - Shadow_of_the_Dome - 12:02am 11/3/25
- He made a guess call and may have been looking for anything to affect the game at a crucial - THEISMANCARR - 8:09pm 11/2/25
- Conferences aren't giving up the power to control wins and losses. Just. Not. Happening. - Clem - 2:14pm 11/2/25
- That was beyond negligence. - iairishcheeks - 1:28pm 11/2/25
- When the "networks" have rules analysts on staff who are fact checkers for sports: highly dubious. - LanceManion - 1:02pm 11/2/25
- an official has to know that happened. U can’t think it happened or it looked - ndphysics - 1:08pm 11/2/25
- I watch a lot of college football and say the level of officiating is significantly worse now than - ndphysics - 1:00pm 11/2/25
- Years ago the mistakes centered around spotting of the ball and phantom holds on occasion but now - THEISMANCARR - 8:12pm 11/2/25
- Agreed [NT] - whatsamataU - 3:06pm 11/2/25
- Yes [NT] - ColeyO - 12:28pm 11/2/25