he wasn't learning to be a HC, he already knew that part which gave him the flexibility to do that
Marcus Freeman was hired with zero experience and is in year 4 of learning to be a HC...and he's doing a great job at that, but these two situations are still not the same
Who knows how bad it might have looked if Holtz's first 4 years ever coaching were on the Big stage at ND, meanwhile in Freeman's first 4 full seasons he has almost an .800 win percentage
Things should be judged in context