We got that changed but I think the conference schools didn’t like that. I agree something is not adding up and there a weaving narrative to justify it.
ADVERTISEMENT
The first iteration had us not being able to get a first round bye
Replies to: "The first iteration had us not being able to get a first round bye"
- The writing was on the wall and most of you refused to see it. Alabama was moved ahead of ND just - jimbasil - 1:13pm 12/7/25
(10) [View All]
- ND was -1200 last night.. - irishboyd - 2:02pm 12/7/25
- And Alabama and Miami? [NT]
- jimbasil - 2:04pm 12/7/25
- Re: And Alabama and Miami? - irishboyd - 2:17pm 12/7/25
- Check last week’s odds [NT]
- jimbasil - 2:25pm 12/7/25
- Who gives a damn about last week's odds? - irishboyd - 2:41pm 12/7/25
- Thanks, I’ll remember that as your surrender. [NT] - jimbasil - 2:43pm 12/7/25
- Who gives a damn about last week's odds? - irishboyd - 2:41pm 12/7/25
- Check last week’s odds [NT]
- jimbasil - 2:25pm 12/7/25
- Re: And Alabama and Miami? - irishboyd - 2:17pm 12/7/25
- And Alabama and Miami? [NT]
- jimbasil - 2:04pm 12/7/25
- It wasn't that we refused it was just that we hoped Alabama would go back behind us. After the way - THEISMANCARR - 1:20pm 12/7/25
- Um! That’s called refusing to see. [NT] - jimbasil - 1:24pm 12/7/25
- The first iteration had us not being able to get a first round bye - NDWisconsin - 1:16pm 12/7/25
- Don’t over think it. Even SEC homers pointed this out almost 2weeks ago. [NT] - jimbasil - 1:19pm 12/7/25
- ND was -1200 last night.. - irishboyd - 2:02pm 12/7/25
Consent Management