Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

ADVERTISEMENT
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
  • Football
    • 2025 Notre Dame Football Schedule
    • 2024 Notre Dame Roster
    • 2025 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
    • Injury News & Updates
    • Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
    • Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
    • Notre Dame Transfers
    • NFL Fighting Irish
    • Game Archive
    • Player Archive
    • Past Seasons & Results
  • Recruiting
    • Commits
    • News & Rumors
    • Class of 2018 Commit List
    • Class of 2019 Commit List
    • Class of 2020 Commit List
    • Class of 2021 Commit List
    • Archives
  • History
    • Notre Dame Bowl History
    • Notre Dame NFL Draft History
    • Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
    • Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
    • Notre Dame Football National Championships
    • Notre Dame Football Rivalries
    • Notre Dame Stadium
    • Touchdown Jesus
  • Basketball
  • Forums
    • Chat Room
    • Football Forum
    • Open Forum
    • Basketball Board
    • Ticket Exchange
  • Videos
    • Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
    • Notre Dame Player Highlights
    • Hype Videos
  • Latest News
  • Gear
  • About
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Our RSS Feeds
    • Community Rules
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Home > Forums > Football Message Board
Login | Register

On its own, I'm fine with Miami being selected ahead of us. It's everything around it.

Author: jakers (14347 Posts - Original UHND Member)
Posted at 2:14 pm on Dec 8, 2025
View All

The stumpy turd that spoke out a week ago on behalf of the committee clearly explained that there was no significant debate between Miami and Notre Dame. Miami lost to 2 unranked teams, we lost to 2 in the Top Ten. They beat us in Week 1 when we were clearly not anywhere near as good as we have been the last 10 weeks. He was clear as could be in this explanation.

On Sunday, after the A.C.C. lost its chance to have an automatic bid, it was clear that they were at risk of having zero representation. Then -- and only then -- did there somehow arise a need to start debating these two teams. It reeks of posturing and potentially worse between the network that airs the playoff games and their financial ties to the conference in danger of being excluded to the committee that is supposed to make these calls independently.

Additionally, the parameter of "not punishing teams for having conference championship games" suddenly came into play. These games and their inherent risk aren't a problem for the committee to help resolve. The conferences have them at this point simply to make money, and the burden of that risk falls on to them. A team on the bubble shouldn't be able to fail to show up (-3 yards rushing and a 3-touchdown loss) and feel secure that they're given due consideration with 3 losses on their resume, especially when B.Y.U. was quite clearly punished for their loss in their respective championship game.


Replies to: "On its own, I'm fine with Miami being selected ahead of us. It's everything around it."

  • Other than Brady Quinn take, this is also a balanced missle to the CFP Commitee.... [NT] [LINK] - billybaroo - 2:03pm 12/8/25 (11) [View All]
    • On its own, I'm fine with Miami being selected ahead of us. It's everything around it. - jakers - 2:14pm 12/8/25
      • ND has a choice. Go hard now or file this away and use it as leverage for something else. - LanceManion - 7:53pm 12/8/25
      • Me too. They won. But we got hosed the way it all went down. - shep - 4:09pm 12/8/25
      • ESPN debated Miami/ND throughout the Stanfurd telecast. It was their entire commentary in 4th Q. [NT] - NDblues - 2:38pm 12/8/25
        • ESPN delenda est! [NT] - Sjnd5359 - 4:27pm 12/8/25
      • And people were figuring this out on Tuesday night... - irishboyd - 2:29pm 12/8/25
      • Agree. (I wouldn't say "fine" but I understand how it could happen. ) [NT] - TakethetrainKnute - 2:18pm 12/8/25
        • The head to head discussion should have happened in the first poll - NDWisconsin - 2:36pm 12/8/25
          • My guess would be that that comparison was made then. Why exclude it? - DiscoRick - 3:03pm 12/8/25
        • I honestly wouldn't care that much if I thought we'd lose, anyway. - jakers - 2:27pm 12/8/25
          • That was the problem, Jake. The conferences thought so too… [NT] - Sjnd5359 - 4:56pm 12/8/25

Consent Management

Close
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS