Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

ADVERTISEMENT
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
  • Football
    • 2025 Notre Dame Football Schedule
    • 2024 Notre Dame Roster
    • 2025 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
    • Injury News & Updates
    • Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
    • Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
    • Notre Dame Transfers
    • NFL Fighting Irish
    • Game Archive
    • Player Archive
    • Past Seasons & Results
  • Recruiting
    • Commits
    • News & Rumors
    • Class of 2018 Commit List
    • Class of 2019 Commit List
    • Class of 2020 Commit List
    • Class of 2021 Commit List
    • Archives
  • History
    • Notre Dame Bowl History
    • Notre Dame NFL Draft History
    • Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
    • Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
    • Notre Dame Football National Championships
    • Notre Dame Football Rivalries
    • Notre Dame Stadium
    • Touchdown Jesus
  • Basketball
  • Forums
    • Chat Room
    • Football Forum
    • Open Forum
    • Basketball Board
    • Ticket Exchange
  • Videos
    • Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
    • Notre Dame Player Highlights
    • Hype Videos
  • Latest News
  • Gear
  • About
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Our RSS Feeds
    • Community Rules
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Home > Forums > Football Message Board
Login | Register

I'm not so sure

Author: Nigel Tufnel (8241 Posts - Original UHND Member)
Posted at 5:49 pm on Dec 13, 2025
View All

The way this is structured, they are creating a separate, for profit entity with a board of seven members, four of which are from the university and one is an outside donor. The PE firm gets two seats. So the new entity is controlled by the university. Utah is set to receive the majority of the profits from the new entity. The only way the PE firm comes out ahead is if they grow the new entity's revenue. They could lose their entire investment.

This isn't a loan, it is an investment. The university is betting that the PE firm can grow the athletic department revenue better than it can, in exchange for said investment plus a share of future profits.

The vast majority of athletic departments lose money - and they are set to lose more going forward due to the House vs NCAA settlement. So they can either raise student fees, cut sports, try to raise more money or do nothing.

Seems like a creative approach that I'm sure many other programs will be watching closely.


This message has been edited 1 time(s).

'I define fear as standing across from Joe Louis and knowing he wants to go home early.' - Max Baer

Replies to: "I'm not so sure"

  • Many of you may have seen this already. Could this impact our independence?+ [NT] [LINK] - faircatchcorby - 2:10pm 12/13/25 (8) [View All]
    • That’s a bad thing for those schools. They are selling their receivables and revenue - LanceManion - 4:54pm 12/13/25
      • I'm not so sure - Nigel Tufnel - 5:49pm 12/13/25
        • There’s a reason UM & SC opposed this and the big 10 bottom feeders didnt - LanceManion - 8:15pm 12/13/25
          • Agree - Nigel Tufnel - 8:52pm 12/13/25
        • They would help their bottom line if they eliminated revenue losing sports. [NT] - NedoftheHill - 5:55pm 12/13/25
      • This shouldn’t be allowed…but a great deal of what colleges are doing both academically - TakethetrainKnute - 5:24pm 12/13/25
      • Agreed. - AlbanyIRISH - 5:00pm 12/13/25
        • Yeah. PE is for finance emergencies or for cash out of current holders at the expense of the future. - NedoftheHill - 5:53pm 12/13/25

Consent Management

Close
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS