There’s a reason UM & SC opposed this and the big 10 bottom feeders didnt

| Register

Author: LanceManion (9357 Posts - Joined: Jul 16, 2010)

View All

If you are trying to build a brand, it might be a good idea. Sophisticated schools with strong brands don’t need to share the revenue.

Imposing corporate abuse, neglect and greed on deserving victims.

Many of you may have seen this already. Could this impact our independence?+ [NT] [LINK] - faircatchcorby - 2:10pm 12/13/25 (8) [View All]
- That’s a bad thing for those schools. They are selling their receivables and revenue - LanceManion - 4:54pm 12/13/25
  - I'm not so sure - Nigel Tufnel - 5:49pm 12/13/25
    - There’s a reason UM & SC opposed this and the big 10 bottom feeders didnt - LanceManion - 8:15pm 12/13/25
      - Agree - Nigel Tufnel - 8:52pm 12/13/25
    - They would help their bottom line if they eliminated revenue losing sports. [NT] - NedoftheHill - 5:55pm 12/13/25
  - This shouldn’t be allowed…but a great deal of what colleges are doing both academically - TakethetrainKnute - 5:24pm 12/13/25
  - Agreed. - AlbanyIRISH - 5:00pm 12/13/25
    - Yeah. PE is for finance emergencies or for cash out of current holders at the expense of the future. - NedoftheHill - 5:53pm 12/13/25

Consent Management