like a few posters on here.
Link: https://www.newsweek.com/tulsi-gabbard-leaves-democratic-party-elitist-cabal-warmongers-1750717
(no message)
to when they have nothing to dispute what is being said.
Maybe she doesn't actually mean "Jews."
But she does.
You can have her.
Revised statement:
"I can no longer remain in today's Democratic Party that is now under the complete control of {JEWISH} warmongers driven by cowardly wokeness, who divide us by racializing every issue & stoke anti-white racism, actively work to undermine our God-given freedoms, hostile to people of faith & spirituality, demonize the police & protect criminals at the expense of law-abiding Americans, believe in open borders, weaponize the national security state to go after political opponents, and above all, dragging us ever closer to nuclear war."
Interesting take, I agree, it's definitely what she meant.
Although using "intellectual" to describe anything she is connected to is obviously a mistake.
Link: https://www.middlebury.edu/institute/academics/centers-initiatives/ctec/ctec-publications/new-world-order-historical-origins-dangerous
(no message)
But I do think that she is repeating a conspiracy theory that has clear anti-Semitic roots. An elitist cabal of globalists - that has a clear meaning, which I am sure she is aware of.
So she is happy to blow the dog whistle.
(no message)
(no message)
I like that she's gone independent, we need a lot more of that.
……but this gives you chance to smear your enemy……with the careful softening that “I don’t think she did it consciously”.
One might point out that your characterization of a black male (Herschel Walker, Clarence Thomas, etc) as being sexually promiscuous and having low intellect has been racist code for centuries (Ralph Ellison would certainly agree).
Now you will probably argue that “in this case, he is”. But Tulsi would also argue that “in this case, there is a cabal of powerful Dem leaders ruining and controlling the party unrelated to history”.
Your statement is nonsense, and you don’t even pass muster on the criteria you use yourself.
(no message)
(no message)
her to the Foreign Affairs Committee. I will gladly take Tulsi over her.
economic policy and and domestic and social policy today.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
here's the truth from an honorable, experienced insider:
"...today's Democratic Party ... is now under the complete control of an elitist cabal of warmongers driven by cowardly wokeness, who divide us by racializing every issue & stoke anti-white racism, actively work to undermine our God-given freedoms, hostile to people of faith & spirituality, demonize the police & protect criminals at the expense of law-abiding Americans, believe in open borders, weaponize the national security state to go after political opponents, and above all, dragging us ever closer to nuclear war."
once again, irrefutable logic.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
NOT!
has different political views than yourself. And you support the Party of Slavery rather than the Party of Lincoln.
And you attack Clarence Thomas in the very same way.
Liberalism Rule #1. Accuse others of that which you yourself do/are.
and stupid. Herschel Walker isn't stupid because he's black, he's just stupid.
PS: Tommy Tuberville and all the Republicans mentioned and so many more are bigots and racists.
Try not to confuse them with being Democrats.
How about you name all the R's who resigned from their elected positions because of their overt racism and
ridiculous statements of bigotry.
(no message)