….let all of the other votes in the state come in so you know the target for the number of votes you need to manufacture. Withhold the results from a heavy blue Dem city where many additional votes can be manufactured and will come in at a 90% Dem to GOP ratio. Using loads of ballots without proper ID further facilitates the cheating in those states where it’s available for abuse (this is why most Dems really oppose voter ID if they are willing to be openly honest about it).
I would love to hear the excuse from liberals here why it is that Gary IN, Wayne County MI, Dade County Fla, Philadelphia Pa, etc, etc, etc are always the last to report. Will they offer up a racist excuse? (why yes they will).
But it’s not racism, nor poverty (those polls have been given extra money and attention). It is planned voter fraud.
This is the problem. Hopefully, the margins today are beyond their ability to reasonably jig.
The ruling is bad simply because it facilitates cheating in a close election.
(no message)
(no message)
harvesting
I’m open to hope.
When something happens beyond statistical probability, I am suspect (follow the science and all).
Your party cheats and then laments that we can trust them. Further, you then accuse the other side of doing it.
(no message)
several others allow mail-in voting under certain circumstances...been going on for decades w/o objection from either party...takes extra time to tabulate those votes.
Link: https://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/vopp-table-18-states-with-all-mail-elections.aspx
....then your election denial might not be utter bullshit.
But there isn't. It is a secure system.
You are indeed a mark.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Is it really hard to understand why more densely populated areas might take longer to report than sparsely populated ones?
WHY IS IT THAT TRAFFIC IS SO MUCH WORSE AROUND A STADIUM AFTER A FOOTBALL GAME THAN WHEN THERE WAS NO GAME?!
This is the shit your side does - suggest something that is easily explicable without context in order to imply something without evidence. HOW COULD TRUMP LOSE WHEN HE GOT MORE VOTES THAN IN 2016?! Etc etc etc
If there was cheating, we'd know about it.
I'm channeling my inner Democrat.
10 miles away by 5 lane expressways with traffic jams.
You excuse does not hold water. In fact, people “in the country” are further away and cannot walk or use public transit.
Also, the problem is virtually nonexistent in nonbattleground states.
Sorry.
Will you accept my proposal above for simultaneous submission after collection is complete?
some widely used venues used as voting precincts to destinations miles away from original site that was already in itself not in a walking distance from the neighborhoods they serve.
They also shortened the voting hours at those locations and provided few machines and little parking - all to discourage a certain type of voter.
This was done in 2016 and 2020.
Haven’t heard if it’s the same this year.
Republican run States.
(no message)
BVZ is a classic example...willfully uninformed, yet firm in his 'conviction'...it's sad to have a boat anchor like him to deal with.
(no message)
that is, anything other than psychedelics ;-)
They just change the subject to issues they are comfortable with.
It is always just pissing into the wind.
his list and then go through it with actual posts of his that expose his hypocrisy...
And it was in Caps so you really meant it.
from this type of cheating? Even if you think it’ll not possible, it would solve the problem you were crying about (which your party actually created).
Especially when no answer follows.
locals.