Mayor Pete was a mentor for this dude?
Link: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/maryland-mayor-facing-child-porn-charges-said-pete-buttigieg-mentor
(no message)
Sec'y Buttigieg would be a logical mentor to him...the insinuation that a Gay man would be complicit in his perversion is...perverse...own it.
(no message)
The the other Mayor wanted…only a perverse mentality would try to associate Pete Buttigieg with Pedophilia.
(no message)
Papal infallability is forcing him to dance around the issue he wishes he didn't. It is wrong, and he can dance around it all that he wants, but when pressed, he says it is wrong. He tried to issue a damage control follow up clarification saying. "I was talking about catholic moral teaching"....well yeah. The follow up just reconfirmed it. Pope Francis is a very flawed pope, but even he must live within the bounds of papal infallability which does not (as most people wrongly think) give a pope ultimate power to dictate terms, but instead prevents a bad pope from corrupting the doctrine of the Church.
Link: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/pope-francis-homosexuality-not-a-crime-but-gay-sex-a-sin/
(no message)
(no message)
Acceptance…not discrimination.
His "openness" is a sign of weakness and a disgrace to the papacy.
The German bishops have jumped on this and are openly defiant of him. We're on the the verge of another German- driven Reformation.
None of this madness would have occurred under a faithful pope like St. John Paul II.
Pope Francis is right and you're wrong...some excerpts from that interview...
---------------
Pope Francis criticized laws that criminalize homosexuality as “unjust,” saying God loves all his children just as they are and called on Catholic bishops who support the laws to welcome LGBTQ people into the church.
---------------
Francis acknowledged that Catholic bishops in some parts of the world support laws that criminalize homosexuality or discriminate against LGBTQ people, and he himself referred to the issue in terms of “sin.” But he attributed such attitudes to cultural backgrounds, and said bishops in particular need to undergo a process of change to recognize the dignity of everyone.
---------------
Declaring such laws “unjust,” Francis said the Catholic Church can and should work to put an end to them. “It must do this. It must do this,” he said.
---------------
Francis quoted the Catechism of the Catholic Church in saying gay people must be welcomed and respected, and should not be marginalized or discriminated against.
“We are all children of God, and God loves us as we are and for the strength that each of us fights for our dignity,” Francis said, speaking to the AP in the Vatican hotel where he lives.
---------------
On Tuesday, Francis said there needed to be a distinction between a crime and a sin with regard to homosexuality. Church teaching holds that homosexual acts are sinful, or “intrinsically disordered,” but that gay people must be treated with dignity and respect.
Bantering with himself, Francis articulated the position: “It’s not a crime. Yes, but it’s a sin. Fine, but first let’s distinguish between a sin and a crime.”
“It’s also a sin to lack charity with one another,” he added.
--------------
This last excerpt begs the question...for a Catholic follower of Jesus, which is the bigger sin...being intrinsically Gay and acting in accordance with your nature?...or, marginalizing and discriminating against another child of God just because they are different than you?
Link: https://apnews.com/article/pope-francis-gay-rights-ap-interview-1359756ae22f27f87c1d4d6b9c8ce212
will be noted everytime he posts. He should sit this one out. He's way too close to the topc
things, but it's not our business to intervene.
If so, you’re about 100 years behind the rest of humanity.
Evolution only took off when it happened upon heterosexuality. Any other form of reproduction is retro. Its only purpose is to reduce population.
But maybe evolution knows what it is doing?
So, basically it is a mutation which must occur in every generation at an unsupportably high rate, because it is weeded out of every generation by natural selection.
Oh...and they've never identified this gay gene...but we must believe it exists, or we are science deniers...because apparently science is now defined as any crazy ass thing progressives come up with.
Meanwhile, that sex gene? Means nothing. And if you think it defines sex, you are a science denier.
I forget which of Baron's rules this is, but it (science denial) is a great example of them knowing they are wrong so they accuse the GOP of doing exactly that which they are doing.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
I was working through a thought I had about how one set of ideas can corrupt thinking more comprehensively. Nobody bit on that thread, likely because I didn't explain it as well as Romans 1.
The thing about Romans 1 though, is that Romans 2:1 follows it.
His beliefs on the morality of homosexuality are his own, and not for you to intimidate.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
It would have better to ask if the Mayer is an idiot because he hangs out with an idiot.
associated with at one time. This is news because Pete is a high profile person. If it was a guy down the street it would be a small blip in the local paper,
when they are gay now?
It was a surprising response...and a defensive one that should be further questioned for clarification. Even Buttigeig's office condemned it.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Link: gargle balls
you are the perfect Tabloid customer...thanks for showing us how far down the ladder you are.
I know this news is hitting you pretty hard given that the Mayor is one of your heros, but that doesn't mean you get to sass me. Take the ball gag out of your mouth and figure out a way to attach it to your hands.
(no message)
The question is, why did it take you this long to figure it out?